An expert report is written for a court, not for a client. It has to comply with the relevant expert evidence code, state its assumptions and instructions on the face of the document, and hold up under cross-examination. We prepare valuation evidence for the Federal Circuit and Family Court, state Supreme Courts, and the AAT in tax disputes.
Quick answer
An expert witness valuation report is court-ready evidence prepared to the applicable expert witness code: a stated opinion, the facts and assumptions relied on, the methodology, and the valuer's declaration and credentials. We prepare reports for family law, tax disputes and general litigation, and can act as a single expert where the court directs.
An expert witness report is a document prepared for the court under a duty that overrides any duty to the party paying for it. It must set out the expert's instructions, qualifications, the facts and assumptions relied on, the reasoning behind each conclusion, and any matter that would materially affect the opinion. A valuation prepared for a client and later relabelled as expert evidence will not satisfy that standard.
Which code applies depends on the jurisdiction. We confirm it with the instructing solicitor before drafting, because it changes the structure of the report.
Expert valuation evidence is usually needed where the value of real property is genuinely in dispute, or where a single expert has been appointed to resolve it.
The valuation methodology is the same rigorous process we apply to every report — the difference is in the documentation. Every assumption is attributed to an instruction or a source, so that each step can be tested in the witness box.
A report is often the start rather than the end. We are available for the steps that follow, and we quote them separately so there are no surprises.
Illustrative example
A former couple disagree about the value of the former matrimonial home. One has an agent appraisal, the other a bank valuation obtained for refinancing. Neither is evidence.
The trap. The brief matters more than people expect. A valuer can value a property at a date; a valuer cannot decide which date the law requires, or which of two competing accounts of the property’s history is true. Those are questions for the lawyers, and a brief that asks the expert to choose produces a report that is vulnerable on exactly that point.
This scenario is constructed to illustrate the method and the sequence. It is not a client matter, contains no client information, and is not a prediction about your property. Which provision applies to your circumstances is a question for your accountant or tax agent.
The errors we are asked to correct are almost never errors of judgement about value. They are procedural, they are made before anyone thinks to involve a valuer, and they cost more to fix than to avoid.
Retrofitting a tax report for court. A report written for a tax file has no code acknowledgement, no declaration and no statement of facts and assumptions. Amending one afterwards is worse than commissioning a fresh report, because the amendments themselves become a line of cross-examination.
Instructing on a question the expert cannot answer. Asking a valuer to determine the applicable date, or to prefer one party’s version of the facts, exceeds the expertise and undermines the report.
Treating a bank valuation as evidence. It was prepared for a lender, on lending assumptions, often without an internal inspection, and addressed to someone who is not a party. It will not carry weight and offering it can damage credibility.
This page is general information about how valuations are used for tax purposes. It is not tax advice. Your accountant or tax agent should confirm which provision applies to your circumstances.
Written and reviewed by
Jarrad Khoury
Head of Valuations at Asset Valuations Group, where he leads the Business Valuation Services division. Over 10 years in property and business valuation. Registered Valuer in Queensland (Not Limited), Licensed Valuer in Western Australia (Not Limited), CPV through the Australian Property Institute (Not Limited), CPV and CBV through the Australian Valuers Institute, and Registered Business Valuer through the AIBB.
Last reviewed 15 September 2026 · About the practice · Editorial policy
FAQs
The questions clients, accountants and solicitors ask us most often.
Yes. We are regularly appointed as a single expert in family law property matters, and we accept joint instructions from both parties' solicitors.
Typically 7–10 business days from inspection, longer where the property is complex or the instructions raise multiple questions. Urgent court timetables can usually be accommodated — tell us the date at the quote stage.
Yes. Attendance for cross-examination, joint expert conferences and conferences with counsel are all available and quoted separately from the report.
We confirm the jurisdiction with the instructing solicitor and prepare to the applicable code — Part 7 of the Family Law Rules 2021 in the Federal Circuit and Family Court, the Harmonised Expert Witness Code in most superior courts, GPN-EXPT in the Federal Court.
Expert reports are quoted individually, because the scope depends on the questions asked and the complexity of the property. The fee is fixed in writing before we begin.
Related services