SMSF Property Valuations for audit and compliance.
Trustees of a self-managed super fund must report assets at market value every year, and the auditor must be satisfied that the figure is supportable. For property, that means an independent valuation prepared to a recognised standard — not a trustee estimate, and not an online price guide.
Quick answer
An SMSF property valuation gives trustees and auditors the market value required by SIS Regulation 8.02B at 30 June. It is independent, dated to the reporting period, and documented with the comparable evidence an auditor needs to sign off without qualification. Fixed fees from $440 incl. GST, delivered in 5 business days.
What the SIS Act requires
Regulation 8.02B of the SIS Regulations requires that assets in an SMSF be valued at market value when preparing the fund's accounts and statements. The ATO expects trustees to use objective and supportable data, and auditors are required to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence that the reported value is reasonable. For real property — the least liquid, hardest-to-price asset most funds hold — an independent valuation from a qualified valuer is the evidence that satisfies both.
When a valuation is required
Some triggers are annual; others are one-off events that the auditor will look for specifically.
- Annual financial statements — market value as at 30 June.
- Acquisition of business real property from a related party.
- In-specie contribution or in-specie transfer out of the fund.
- Commencement of a pension, or a partial commutation.
- Payment of a death benefit or a lump sum from the fund.
- Any transaction between the fund and a related party.
What makes a valuation audit-ready
Auditors qualify reports that state a figure without showing the work. Ours are built the other way round: the conclusion is short and the evidence behind it is complete.
- Prepared by a Certified Practising Valuer independent of the fund and its members.
- A schedule of comparable sales with full addresses, dates and adjustments.
- For leased commercial property, net income analysis and market capitalisation rates.
- Stated methodology, assumptions and limiting conditions.
- Effective date matching the fund's reporting date exactly.
Trustee estimate vs registered valuation
A trustee estimate or an agent appraisal may pass in a simple year, but it is the first thing an auditor queries and the first thing the ATO tests on review.
What we deliver to the fund
We send the signed PDF to the trustee and, on request, directly to the accountant and the auditor — so the audit file is complete without anyone forwarding attachments.
- Market value as at the fund's reporting date.
- Comparable sales schedule and adjustment matrix.
- Independence declaration and valuer qualifications.
- Signed certification by a Certified Practising Valuer.
How it works — five steps
Worked example: a fund property at 30 june, and an in-specie transfer
Illustrative example
A fund holds a commercial unit. The trustees need a market value at 30 June for the financial statements, and separately a value at the transfer date because a member is taking the asset out as a benefit payment.
- SIS Regulation 8.02B requires fund assets to be carried at market value in the financial statements each 30 June, so the first effective date is 30 June.
- We inspect, analyse lease terms and market rents, and apply a capitalisation approach cross-checked against comparable sales — commercial valuation turns on income, not just on sales evidence.
- The report states the 30 June effective date, the evidence relied on, the methodology and the certification, in the form an auditor needs to sign off without qualification.
- The in-specie transfer is a separate CGT event at a separate date, so a second value at the transfer date is required — the 30 June figure cannot be reused for it.
- Because the transfer is with a related party, the value has to withstand scrutiny for arm’s-length dealing as well as for the accounts.
- Where the property is a significant share of the fund, the auditor will look for independent evidence rather than trustee estimates.
The trap. Two dates, two purposes, one property. The 30 June figure is for the accounts; the transfer figure is for the CGT event and the arm’s-length test. Using one for both is the error auditors raise most often.
This scenario is constructed to illustrate the method and the sequence. It is not a client matter, contains no client information, and is not a prediction about your property. Which provision applies to your circumstances is a question for your accountant or tax agent.
What goes wrong
The errors we are asked to correct are almost never errors of judgement about value. They are procedural, they are made before anyone thinks to involve a valuer, and they cost more to fix than to avoid.
Reusing last year’s figure. The ATO expects trustees to review value each year with current evidence. Carrying the same number forward across years is a documented driver of Reg 8.02B breach reports.
A trustee or member valuing the property. Where the asset is a significant proportion of the fund, the auditor will want independent evidence. A trustee estimate is the cheapest route to a qualified audit report.
One report for two dates. The 30 June value and the in-specie transfer value are separate effective dates for separate purposes. Ask for both at the quoting stage — additional dates on the same property cost less than a second engagement.
Sources
- Verifying the market value of fund assets — Australian Taxation Office — what SMSF auditors must obtain
- Market valuation for tax purposes — Australian Taxation Office — the eight valuation fundamentals
- Australian Property Institute — Professional Practice Standards and the CPV designation
This page is general information about how valuations are used for tax purposes. It is not tax advice. Your accountant or tax agent should confirm which provision applies to your circumstances.
Written and reviewed by
Jarrad Khoury
Head of Valuations at Asset Valuations Group, where he leads the Business Valuation Services division. Over 10 years in property and business valuation. Registered Valuer in Queensland (Not Limited), Licensed Valuer in Western Australia (Not Limited), CPV through the Australian Property Institute (Not Limited), CPV and CBV through the Australian Valuers Institute, and Registered Business Valuer through the AIBB.
Last reviewed 15 September 2026 · About the practice · Editorial policy
FAQs
SMSF valuation questions, answered.
The questions clients, accountants and solicitors ask us most often.
Does an SMSF need a valuation every year?
Assets must be reported at market value every year. A full valuation is not always required annually for residential property, but the auditor must see objective, supportable evidence — and for commercial or related-party property a current independent valuation is the safest position.
Can a trustee or a member value the property?
No. The valuation must be independent of the fund and its members. A valuer with any interest in the property or relationship to the members cannot provide it.
What effective date should the report carry?
30 June of the relevant financial year for annual reporting, or the transaction date for an in-specie transfer, pension commencement or related-party acquisition.
Will the auditor accept your report?
Yes. Our reports are prepared to API Professional Practice Standards with a full comparable sales schedule and an independence declaration — the format every major SMSF auditor asks for.
How much does an SMSF valuation cost?
Standard metropolitan residential valuations start from $440 incl. GST. Commercial and business real property is quoted individually and typically takes 7–10 business days.
Related services